AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
|
|||||||
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului. |
|||||||
STUDIA THEOLOGIA%20REFORMATA%20TRANSYLVANICA - Ediţia nr.1 din 2021 | |||||||
Articol: |
SPECTRUL INFAILIBILITĂȚII: EXPLORAREA CONTRIBUȚIEI TIPOLOGIEI LUI DAVID S. DOCKERY LA DEZBATEREA EVANGHELICĂ ASUPRA NOȚIUNII INFAILIBILITĂȚII / THE SPECTRUM OF INERRANCY: AN EXPLORATION OF DAVID S. DOCKERY’S TYPOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE INERRANCY DEBATE IN EVANGELICALISM. Autori: DESJARDINS GABRIEL A.. |
||||||
Rezumat: DOI: 10.24193/subbtref.66.1.04 Published Online: 2021-06-20 Published Print: 2021-06-30 pp. 69-96 VIEW PDF FULL PDF ABSTRACT. The present article explores the typological contributions to the inerrancy debate of David S. Dockery, the Chancellor of Trinity International University. Resulting from controversies in the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) during the 1970s and 80s, Dockery provided a valuable typological framework for identifying a spectrum of positions in the inerrancy debate. Dockery’s frameworks provide a helpful lens for understanding the complexity of inerrancy. Some positions are more conservative and deductivist, and other positions are more liberal and inductivist. These distinctions often create a barrier, a presuppositional divide, which is difficult to cross in a debate context. Dockery’s variations provide a means of at least understanding the divide and the positions that differ from one’s own. To that aim, I present Dockery’s variations as a vital component for all attempts at dialogue in the inerrancy debate Keywords: evangelicalism, biblical inerrancy, David S. Dockery, biblical authority, hermeneutics |
|||||||