AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
|
|||||||
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului. |
|||||||
STUDIA PHILOLOGIA - Ediţia nr.1 din 2015 | |||||||
Articol: |
RECENZIE - SIMONA ELISABETA CATANĂ - PLAYING GAMES WITH FICTION: THE PAST IN PETER ACKROYD’S WORK. BUCUREŞTI: ARS DOCENDI, 2011. 270 PP. Autori: ALINA-ELENA ONEŢ. |
||||||
Rezumat: Peter Ackroyd is a notoriously difficult writer to pin down: his prose is in turn lucid and sinuous, fluid and overblown, cryptic and abundant in obscure detail; his stylistic register moves from a playful preference for intertext and metafiction to the stolid rigour of an archiver of lives and cities. From poetry, fiction and various types of non-fiction, he has tried his hand at various genres (including the production of television programmes), and is fantastically prolific – there is at least one volume appearing every year, and he has admitted in several interviews to working on several projects at the same time. How can any critical study hope to engage such a massive, diverse and chameleonic writer? These are some of the reasons why he has been less beloved of literary critics than, say, a Martin Amis or a Ian McEwan, for no sooner have they settled into a comfortable categorisation for Ackroyd’s prose than he immediately produces something which defies the current critical orthodoxy. Hence he is both the quintessential ‘postmodernist’ (heteroglossic, hybrid, playful), but also the biographer-turned historian, antiquarian both by temperament and vocation. | |||||||