AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
|
|||||||
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului. |
|||||||
STUDIA PHILOSOPHIA - Ediţia nr.Special Issue 1 din 2014 | |||||||
Articol: |
THE ISSUE OF COGNITIVIST MODELS OF METAPHOR COMPREHENSION. Autori: . |
||||||
Rezumat: The Issue of Cognitivist Models of Metaphor Comprehension. Metaphor is one of the most controversial phenomena of the last few of decades, and connected to it are some very interesting methodologies propounded in philosophy, literary studies, and more recently cognitive science. In this paper we will discuss some of the most viable theories coming from the field of cognitive science, in an attempt to tease out some of their merits and shortcomings and to list some of the key issues they propose regarding the comprehension of metaphor. In view of this, we have chosen three of the most representative cognitivist models, all of which put forward a different mechanism to account for the comprehension process: George Lakoff and Mark Turner’s conceptual metaphor model, Sam Glucksberg’s interactive property attribution model and Dedre Gentner’s structural alignment model. Keywords: metaphor, comprehension, concepts, categories, comparison
|
|||||||