AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI
În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.
Autori: .
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/SUBBiur.62(2017).1.3
Published Online: 2017-03-15
Published Print: 2017-03-30
VIEW PDF: GARDA SAU PAZA ÎN CADRUL RĂSPUNDERII DELICTUALE PENTRU LUCRURI - CÂTEVA NOTE
The custody of things in the frame of civil liability for things – some remarks. The current study aims at the so-called custody of things. Although France, Québec, and Romania are taken into account, the reader must be warned: this work is not to be placed on the field of comparative law; rather, foreign law should be noted.After France is dealt with, Québec follows. Mainly, in the latter jurisdiction, emphasis is placed on some cases, i.e., Québec inc. c. Corbeil, Madore c. Bourque, and Lacombe c. Power. Also, Romania does not escape analysis.The paper’s final portion deals with some concluding remarks. We do notice that the drafters of the Romanian Civil Code were animated by the desire to highlight an entity called “juridical custody”. Perhaps, it would have been desirable for said drafters to pay more attention to France.
Keywords: custody, civil liability for things, France, Québec, Romania
