STUDIA SOCIOLOGIA
 
REVIEWS
   
         
         
   
  PEER REVIEW  
           
 

The contents are reviewed by two prestigious persons from outside Babes-Bolyai University, who have to fill up a review standard form. Their suggestions are sent to the author, for further changes. The reviewers are not aware of the authors’ names, as well as the authors don’t have the information regarding reviewers’ names. ( double blind review system).

 
           
           
 

REVIEW FORM FOR STUDIA SOCIOLOGIA

 

TITLE OF THE ARTICLE REVIEWED:

NAME OF THE REVIEWER (TO BE DELETED BY EDITORS):

 

1. Please evaluate the article according to the following criteria:

Mark with X one box per line!

Very poor

Poor

Acceptable

Good

Very good

Excellent

1. Theoretical grounding

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Adequate use of up-to-date literature

 

 

 

 

 

 

3. Structure of the paper

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Quality of conceptualisations

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Research design

 

 

 

 

 

 

6. Quality of the empirical material

 

 

 

 

 

 

7. Empirical data analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

8. Interpretation of empirical findings

 

 

 

 

 

 

9. Quality of argumentation

 

 

 

 

 

 

10. Clarity of arguments

 

 

 

 

 

 

11. Coherence of the argumentation

 

 

 

 

 

 

12. Originality

 

 

 

 

 

 

13. Scholarly contribution

 

 

 

 

 

 

14. Overall evaluation of the paper

 

 

 

 

 

 

15. Quality of using the English language

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2. Evaluation and feedback (300-500 words).

 

1. General evaluation.

2. Observations, critiques.

3. Suggestions for improving the paper.

 

3. Message for editors – please mark with X your opinion!

This article should be…

Rejected

Substantially revised and
re-submitted

Slightly revised and re-submitted

Accepted with only minor changes

Accepted
as it is

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4. Other observations, comments.

…………………………………………………………………………………………

 
           
           
           
 
1200