The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

 
       
         
    STUDIA PHILOSOPHIA - Issue no. 3 / 2020  
         
  Article:   INTELLECTUALISM ABOUT KNOWLEDGE HOW AND SLIPS.

Authors:  CATHRINE V. FELIX.
 
       
         
  Abstract:  
DOI: 10.24193/subbphil.2020.3.01

Published Online: 2020-12-20
Published Print: 2020-12-30
pp. 11-31

VIEW PDF

FULL PDF

ABSTRACT: This paper argues that slips present a problem for reductive intellectualism. Reductive intellectualists (e.g., Stanley and Williamson 2001; Stanley 2011, 2013; Brogaard 2011) argue that knowledge how is a form of knowledge that. Consequently, knowledge how must have the same epistemic properties as knowledge that. Slips show how knowledge how has epistemic properties not present in knowledge that. When an agent slips, she does something different from what she intended; nonetheless, the performance is guided by her knowledge how. This reveals a divide between the knowledge that actively guides behaviour: the knowledge how that the agent applies sub-consciously; and the knowledge how she intends to guide her behaviour in the first place, which she is under the illusion of acting on even as she slips. I argue that this divide between two levels of knowledge how operative in the slip case has no parallel when it comes to knowledge that. Therefore, knowledge how cannot be reduced to knowledge that.

Keywords: Knowledge how, knowledge that, intellectualism, slips, Ryle, Stanley.
 
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page