AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: ȘERBAN MIRCIOIU.
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur. 67(2022).3.4
Article history: Available online April 13, 2022.
©2022 Studia UBB Iurisprudentia. Published by Babeş-Bolyai University.
pp. 125-142
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
The aim in writing the present paper focuses on detailing forced execution of goods used as cult objects. According to art. 27 paragraph 2 of Law 489/2006, sacred goods, respectively goods directly and exclusively affected to the cult, established according to their own statutes, and reflecting the tradition and practices of each cult, acquired by title, are imperceptible and imprescriptible and can be alienated only under well-defined statutory terms specific to each cult. We believe that a distinction should be made between indirect foreclosure in the form of real estate foreclosure - seizure and auctioning of movable property and real estate tracking - public auction and real estate foreclosure and direct foreclosure - in the form of forced transfer of movable and immovable property. In the case of indirect foreclosure of cult goods considered imperceptible, we consider that they cannot be subject to foreclosure. In the case of direct foreclosure, by forcible surrender of movable property and forced surrender of immovable property considered sacred property, we appreciate that they are not imperceptible and may be subject to direct foreclosure, if they have been abusively confiscated by the state between 1940 and 1989, or whether they were taken over without proper titles.
Keywords: imperceptible goods; sacred goods; direct foreclosure/enforcement; forced handover of movable property - forced handover of real estate; indirect foreclosure/enforcement; furniture tracking; real estate tracking.
