The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

  
       
         
    STUDIA IURISPRUDENTIA - Issue no. 3 / 2009  
         
  Article:   AREN’T DECISIONS IN THE INTEREST OF THE LAW ACTUALLY INTERPRETATIVE LAWS? A THEORETICAL STUDY, GROUNDED IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE, OF THE LEGAL CONCEPTS OF REVIEW IN THE INTEREST OF THE LAW AND DECISION IN THE INTEREST OF THE LAW.

Authors:  ARON SAMU. 		 
       
         
  Abstract:  Following a thorough theoretical analysis, of both the constitutional framework, as well as the relevant legal provisions, conducted by always relating to the vast jurisprudence that the Constitutional Court has established in the matter, and also to the doctrinarian studies that have investigated the issue as well, we believe that our current study managed to prove that the question should be answered in an affirmative way. And it didn’t stop here, but pressed on to also analyze the practical consequences which derive from such an answer. The result? The shaping of a new theory, whose implications add a bit of color to the constitutional law landscape.

Keywords: Review in the interest of the law, Decision in the interest of the law, interpretative law, the applying of the law over time, the control over the constitutionality of laws
  
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page