AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: CIPRIAN MIHALI.
DOI: 10.24193/subbphil.2022.3.09
Published Online: 2022-12-10
pp. 149-159
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
Abstract: “The Intermediary” in the Philosophy of Space: Precariousness, Creation, Freedom. The reflection proposed by this text is the result of a dialogue spread over several years between philosophers and geographers. The best common ground between each other – in the right middle of the road – is undoubtedly the concept of the “intermediary”, which describes, negatively or affirmatively, the future of our physical, social, conceptual spaces and which speaks to us about discontinuity, hybridization, flow, contiguity, but also vulnerability, counterpowers and freedom. We wanted to show that far from being a concept of the residual, the unassimilable, the incomprehensible or even the irrational, the intermediary is the place of hospitality, the open work of alternative creativity, resistance, or affirmation of those who, excluded from dominant discourses, claim a right to speak and freely participate in social life.
Keywords: Public space, social space, precariousness, intermediary, hybridization, resistance, creation.
Résumé : La réflexion proposée par ce texte est issue d’un dialogue étalé sur plusieurs années entre philosophes et géographes. Le meilleur terrain d’entente entre les uns et les autres – au milieu du chemin – est sans doute le concept de « l’intermédiaire », qui rend compte, de façon négative ou affirmative, des devenirs de nos espaces (physiques, sociales, conceptuelles) et qui nous parle de discontinuité, d’hybridation, flux, contiguïté, mais aussi vulnérabilité, contrepouvoirs et liberté. Nous avons voulu montrer que loin d’être un concept du résiduel, de l’inassimilable, de l’incompréhensible ou même de l’irrationnel, l’intermédiaire est le lieu d’accueil, l’œuvre ouverte des créativités alternatives, des résistances ou d’affirmation de ceux qui, exclus des discours dominants, revendiquent un droit de parole et de participation libre à la vie sociale.
Mots-clés : Espace public, espace social, précarité, intermédiaire, hybridisation, résistance, creation.
