The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

  
       
         
    STUDIA PHILOSOPHIA - Issue no. 3 / 2013  
         
  Article:   THE BEING OF HISTORY, THE PLAY OF DIFFÉRANCE AND THE PROBLEM OF MISUNDERSTANDING.

Authors:  ADRIAN COSTACHE. 		 
       
         
  Abstract:  Beginning with the second decade of the last century, after a fierce critique of W. Dilthey and the Historical School’s epistemological approach, philosophical hermeneutics has assumed the position of “official” philosophy of history of our times. In the present paper we would like to show that in spite of this position philosophical hermeneutics proves nevertheless incapable to answer one of the two basic questions confronting any philosophy of history whatsoever, namely “How is history to be known?,” making historical science problematic. For if the being of history really is tradition as philosophical hermeneutics argues, and if the essence of tradition is language then, on the one hand, the very stability of historical meaning presupposed by any epistemological process will always be displaced by the play of what Derrida calls “difference”. And, on the other hand, even if historical meaning were stable enough so as to be known, it could not be grasped because, we will try to argue, the process of understanding as philosophical hermeneutics describes it is always permeated by misunderstanding.

Key Words: Epistemology of History; Historical Knowledge, Dilthey; Heidegger; Gadamer

 
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page