AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: CRISTINA TOMULEȚ.
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur. 67(2022).3.6
Article history: Available online April 13, 2022.
©2022 Studia UBB Iurisprudentia. Published by Babeş-Bolyai University.
pp. 183-215
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
In this article, I analyzed the ECHR judgment of Tusă v. Romania from various possible perspectives: the perspective of the Romanian state, the perspective of the applicant and the perspective of the European Court. Thus, I examined the facts and the legal issues, pointing out the relevant problems regarding the right to an effective procedure in the context of medical negligence.
Keywords: European Court of Human Rights; art. 8 of the European Convention; the right to health; medical negligence; mindsets; effective procedures; perspectives.
