The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

 
       
         
    STUDIA IURISPRUDENTIA - Issue no. 3 / 2021  
         
  Article:   CHARGE – FIXED AND FLOATING: AGNEW AND ANOTHER V. COMMISSIONER OF INLAND REVENUE, PRIVY COUNCIL (NEW ZEALAND), 5 JUNE 2001 (THE “BRUMARK” CASE) CHARGE AND HYPOTHEC AS FUNCTIONAL EQUIVALENTS.

Authors:  ADRIAN TAMBA.
 
       
         
  Abstract:  
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur.66(2021).3.2

Published Online: 2021-12-31
Published Print: 2021-12-31
pp. 59-76

FULL PDF

Abstract: Our endeavour is dedicated to a few security devices. The first part of the current work is called “Words of Introduction”. The second portion takes into account a Privy Council case: Agnew and Another v. Commissioner of Inland Revenue, Privy Council (New Zealand), 5 June 2001 (the Brumark case). The third part briefly focuses on charge and mortgage. The fourth portion, in a succinct manner, describes the hypothec. The fifth and final part shows that charge and hypothec are functional equivalents.

Key words: charge, hypothec, mortgage, functional equivalents.
 
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page