AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: CHRISTIAN-DOREL GROSU.
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur.65(2020).3.6
Published Online: 2021-03-09
Published Print: 2021-03-09
pp. 182-193
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
ABSTRACT.
On the occasion of creating a new email account, of buying a good through the use of platforms such as eMag or elefant.ro a person signs contracts whose clauses are many times abusive; clauses which, if faced with, seem to render the consumer stripped of legal means of protection. The most widely encountered clauses such as the above are the choice-of-law clauses and the forum selection clauses. Rushing to the consumer’s aid is the national legislation (Law 193/2000), as well as the European one and the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.
Keywords: abusive clauses, consumer, Law 193/2000
