AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: OANA BUGNAR-COLDEA.
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur.67(2022).2.5
Article history: Available online November 30, 2022; Available print December 30, 2022.
©2022 Studia UBB Iurisprudentia. Published by Babeş-Bolyai University.
pp. 125-140
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
Abstract: The unconstitutionality of the “claims of the civil party” – art. 10 para. (1) of Law no. 241/2005. Recently, the Constitutional Court ruled that the phrase "claims of the civil party" in art. 10 para. (1) of Law no. 241/2005, in the form prior to the amendments brought by Law no. 55/2021 is unconstitutional as it violates the principle of equality of arms. In this context, after a review of the changes brought over time to the provisions of art. 10 para. (1) of Law no. 241/2005 and the arguments of the Constitutional Court, we analyzed to what extent the provision declared unconstitutional violated the provisions of art. 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights or only the provisions of the Constitution by reference to the jurisprudence of the RCC.
Keywords: tax evasion, art. 10 para. (1) of Law no. 241/2005, claims of the civil party, unconstitutionality, unconventionality, equality of arms.
