AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: ADRIAN TAMBA.
Published Online: 2021-06-25
Published Print: 2021-06-30
pp. 133-148
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
My ’opinion’ or, if I may call it so, research begins with a few introductory remarks. It continues with a second section, where the reader may notice a kind of dialogue between APIA and First Investment Bank AD; the two entities discussed whether the Romanian Supreme Court should be asked a question: is the letter of credit an enforceable legal instrument? The third section points out that a lower Romanian court decided that the High Court must intervene, and answer said question. In the fourth section, I try to establish if art. 120 of the Romanian Government’s Ordinance no. 99/2006 applies to a letter of credit. In the fifth one, I highlight that art. 120 of Ordinance no. 99/2006 may be applied to a letter of credit, but only if the underlying contract is a credit contract. The sixth section shows what Romania’s Supreme Court decided, and ends with some food for the thought.
Key words: letter of credit, enforceable instrument, underlying contract, credit contract.
