The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

 
       
         
    STUDIA IURISPRUDENTIA - Issue no. 1 / 2018  
         
  Article:   REMARKS ON THE JUDGMENT, FROM 21 DECEMBER 2016, OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, IN THE CASE "COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION V FRONT POPULAIRE POUR LA LIBÉRATION DE LA SAGUIA EL HAMRA ET DU RIO DE ORO (FRONT POLISARIO)".

Authors:  MIHAELA-ADRIANA OPRESCU.
 
       
         
  Abstract:  
The way in which the European Union had approached its trade relations with Morocco was brought to the attention of the European court, asked to rule on the compatibility between the liberalisation agreement of 2012 and European, as well as international public law.Among others, the task of the Luxembourg Court was to establish the physical area of application of the liberalisation agreement, given that the Kingdom of Morocco ̓s sovereignty over Western Sahara is not recognised by the EU, by any of its member states or by other countries.The 2012 ruling of the ECJ conceals behind Morocco ̓s apparent ‘success’ a victory of the Polisario Front, by opening a political breach for the latter, one that may be exploited in future juridical-diplomatic battles on the matter of Western Sahara ̓s territorial sovereignty.

Keywords: international public law, liberalisation agreement, the principle of self-determination of people, the principle of the relative effect of treaties, Western Sahara, Front Polisario.
 
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page