| |
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name. |
|
| |
Abstract: This paper tries to assess the present living conditions of a minority that is generally perceived as being to a greater extent “different” to the rest of the population, be that to life-styles, culture or economic strategies. While a general picture of this population is also intended, the paper’s main focus is on poverty and poverty reproduction among some of the rural Roma (Gypsy) people. More precisely, it tries to find what relations could be uncovered between the poverty of a minority group and a certain construction of ethnicity. I assumed that in order to trace this connection a microscopic and detailed research of all the aspects of life of a community is needed. I done such a research between 1999 and 2001 in the village Nusfal¾u (S¾laj), where I could track the history of two Roma communities from 1850 up to the present. The results of this research, which I’m presenting in this paper, put in comparison a very poor Roma community, whose daily life is pictured in great details, with a rich one, trying to explain how variables like history, mobility, degree of assimilation and traditional work patterns - in connection with different constructions of ethnicity - determine or prevent the state of poverty. One of the most unexpected and puzzling finding of the research is that the more assimilated a rural Roma community is, the greater are the chances to remain poor or even to become extremely poor during transition, and the less assimilated or “traditional” a community stay, the greater are the chances to cope or to enrich during transition. |
|
