AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: GEORGIANA CICEO.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24193/subbeuropaea.2017.1.03
Published Online: 2017-03-15
Published Print: 2017-03-30
FULL PDF
ABSTRACT:
The present article looks at the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) through the lenses of policy analysis in order to assess the processes through which its stated goal to ‘support and foster stability, security and prosperity in the countries closest to its borders’ are transposed into practice and produce an impact on its neighbours. It proceeds from the assumption that due to the embeddedness of this policy in the enlargement policy it overstrains the institutional framework set up for this policy and leads to mixed results in its evaluation. If the focus of the entire neighbourhood policy has been recalibrated several times from its inception, its modus operandi suffered only limited alterations. This paved the way to an excessive bureaucratization of the entire policy, which impacted directly on EU’s capacity to attain its core objectives.
Keywords: European Neighbourhood Policy, external governance, democratization, bureaucratization.
Bibliography:
1. Arts, Bas; Van Tatenhove, Jan (2004), ‘Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms,’ Policy Sciences, Vol. 37, pp. 339–356.
2. Buzogany, Aron (2016), ‘Governance and governmentality of EU neighbourhood policy. Two perspectives on the role of civil society in external democracy promotion,’ in Vera Axyonova, (ed.), European Engagement Under Review. Exporting Values, Rules, and Practices to Post-Soviet Space, Stuttgart, ibidem-Verlag, 2016, pp. 59-84.
3. Cadier, David (2013), ‘Is the European Union a substitute for enlargement?’ in London School of Economics IDEAS Reports, The Crisis of EU Enlargement, Special Report, November 2013, pp. 52-58.
4. Checkel, Jeffrey T. (2001), ‘Why Comply? Social Learning and European Identity Change’ in International Organization, Vol. 55, No. 3, pp. 553–588.
5. Dimitrova, Antoaneta; Pridham, Geoffrey (2004) ‘International actors and democracy promotion in central and eastern Europe: the integration model and its limits’ in Democratization, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 91-112.
6. Epstein, Charlotte (2012), ‘Stop Telling us How to Behave: Socialization or Infantilization?’ in International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 13, pp. 135–145.
7. European Commission, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy, Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, JOIN(2015) 50 final, Brussels, 18 November 2015, [http://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/enp/documents/2015/151118_joint-communication_review-of-the-enp_en.pdf], 15 March 2017.
8. European Commission, Speech by President Juncker at the Forum of the outermost regions, Brussels, 31 March 2017, [http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-17-824_fr.htm], 1 April 2017.
9. European External Actions Service (2015), European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP), [https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/330/european-neighbourhood-policy-enp_en], 15 March 2017.
10. FT lexicon, ‘Definition of path dependence’ in Financial Times, [http://lexicon.ft.com/Term?term=path-dependence] 15 March 2017.
11. Grabbe, Heather (2006), The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe, Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan.
12. Hix, Simon; Høyland, Bjørn (2011), The Political system of the European Union, 3-rd edition, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.
13. Haughton, Tim (2007), ‘When does the EU Make a Difference? Conditionality and the Accession Process in Central and Eastern Europe’ in Political Science Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 233-246.
14. Hughes, James; Sasse, Gwendolyn; Gordon, Claire (2005), Europeanization and Regionalization in the EU’s Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe. The Myth of Conditionality, Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan.
15. Knoepfel, Peter; Larrue, Corinne; Varone, Frédéric; Hill, Michael (2007), Public Policy Analysis, Bristol, The Policy Press.
16. Lynch, Dov (2003), “Russia faces Europe”, in Chaillot Papers, No. 60.
17. Majone, Giandomenico (2005), Dilemmas of European integration. The ambiguities and ptfalls of integration by stealth, New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Manners, Ian (2002),‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’ in Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 2035–58.
19. Pridham, Geoffrey (2005), Designing Democracy: EU Enlargement and Regime Change in Post Communist Europe, Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan.
20. Sadurski, Wojciech (2004), ‘Accession’s Democracy Dividend: The Impact of the EU Enlargement upon Democracy in the New Member States’ in European Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 371-401.
21. Schimmelfennig, Frank (2007), “European regional organizations, political conditionality, and democratic transformation in Eastern Europe”, in East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 126-141.
22. Schimmelfennig, Frank; Sedelmeier, Ulrich (2004), “Governance by conditionality: EU rules transfer to candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe”, in Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 661-679.
23. Schimmelfennig, Frank; Sedelmeier, Ulrich (eds.) (2005), The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Ithaca and London, Cornell University Press.
24. Schimmelfennig, Frank; Engert, Stefan; Knobel, Heiko (2006), International Socialization in Europe: European Organizations, Political Conditionality and Democratic Change, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke.
25. Sedelmeier, Ulrich(2010), ‘Enlargement. From Rules for Accession to a Policy Towards Europe’ in Wallace, Helen; Pollack, Mark A.; Young Alasdair R. (ed.), Policy-Making in the European Union, 6-th edition, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 401-429.
26. Wright, Nick (2011), “The European Union: What Kind of International Actor?”, in Political Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2011, p. 28.
27. Young, Alasdair R. (2010), “The European Policy Process in Comparative Perspective”, in Wallace, Helen; Pollack, Mark A.; Young Alasdair R. (ed.), Policy-Making in the European Union, 6-th edition, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 45-68.
