Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI

În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.

 
       
         
    STUDIA THEOLOGIA%20REFORMATA%20TRANSYLVANICA - Ediţia nr.1 din 2021  
         
  Articol:   MODELUL DE PERMETAFORĂ AL LUI WALTER BRUEGGEMANN ÎN PRISMA UNOR CRITICI / WALTER BRUEGGEMANN PERMETAFORA-MODELLJE, NÉHÁNY KRITIKA FÉNYÉBEN.

Autori:  MÁTHÉ-FARKAS ZOLTÁN.
 
       
         
  Rezumat:  DOI: 10.24193/subbtref.66.1.02

Published Online: 2021-06-20
Published Print: 2021-06-30
pp. 31-52

VIEW PDF

FULL PDF

ABSTRACT.
Walter Brueggemann’s Trial Metaphor Model – In the Light of Some Critiques. Walter Brueggemann’s Theology of the Old Testament evoked a lot of criticism. His trial metaphor as a methodological frame is generally welcomed. But we recognize that the courtroom situation presented in Brueggemann’s way can be seen as a hermeneutical model for referentiality, that is to say: when we do not have any empirically verifiable evidence about God, the only chance for us is to accept the testimony of the biblical text. The rhetoric of the accepted testimony will constitute the reality after this. This opinion of Brueggemann is sharply criticized by many scholars. The present essay tries to answer ‒ in a modest way ‒ some of these judgments and concludes that the reality generated by the testimony can be known and understood better if its rhetoric is primarily analysed through literary study

Keywords: Walter Brueggemann, Old Testament theology, trial/courtroom metaphor, testimony, rhetoric, referentiality, literary study
 
         
     
         
         
      Revenire la pagina precedentă