AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI
În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.
Autori: RALUCA POP.
DOI: 10.24193/subbpsyped.2017.2.03
Published Online: 2017-12-30
Published Print: 2017-12-30
pp. 55-76
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
ABSTRACT: Die Rolle der Studenten Lernprofile in nachhaltiger Fremdsprache differenzierter Lehren. Dieses Dokument soll relevante Einsichten in die Nützlichkeit der Erstellung von Lernprofilen für Studenten im Zusammenhang mit dem Erreichen eines sinnvollen individuellen Unterrichts vermitteln. Um die Anwendbarkeit solcher Lernprofile in differenzierter Ausbildung aufzuzeigen, haben wir den Kontext des Englischunterrichts im Rahmen eines Lehrerfortbildungskurses ausgewählt. Die durchgeführte quantitative Forschung weist darauf hin, dass ein Lernprofil für Studenten dem Lehrer wertvolle Einblicke in das Interesse, die Motivation, die Lernstile und die bevorzugte Art der Intelligenz dem Studenten vermitteln könnte.
Schlüsselwörter: differenziertes Lernen, Lernprofil der Studenten, Inhalt, Prozess, Produkt, Lernstile.
REFERENCES
Chapman, C., King, R., (2005). Differentiated Assessment Strategies: One Tool Doesn’t Fit All. UK, USA, India: Corwin Press Inc.
Dörnyei, Z., Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Multilingual Matters: Bristol.
European Commission, Strengthening teaching in Europe: New evidence from teachers compiled by Eurydice and CRELL, June 2015, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2015.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. USA: Basic Books.
Garnett, S., (2005). Using Brainpower in the Classroom: Five Steps to Accelerate Learning. USA, Canada: Routledge.
Gregory, G.H., Chapman, C. (2002). Differentiated Instructional Strategies. One Size Doesn’t Fit All. California, London, New Delhi: Corwin Press Inc.
Heacox, D. (2002). Differentiating Instruction in the Regular Classroom. How to Reach and Teach all Learners, grades 3-12. USA: Free Spirit Publishing Inc.
Lightbrown, P.M., Spada, N. (2001). Factors Affecting Second Language Learning. In Candlin C., Mercer N., English Language Teaching in Its Social Context: A Reader (pp 28-43). London, New York: Routledge.
Petruș, R. (2013). A reader – The Didactics of the English Language (Ghid de bune practici - Didactica limbii engleze). București: Editura Matrix Rom.
Ryan, K., Cooper, J., Tauer, S. (2011). Teaching for Student Learning: Becoming a Master Teacher. USA, UK, Australia: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
Sternberg, R.J., Zhang, L. (2011). Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles. New York: Routledge.
Tomlinson, C.A. (2017). How to Differentiate Instruction in Academically Diverse Classrooms, Third edition. USA: ASCD.
Websites:
https://www.schooleducationgateway.eu/en/pub/resources/toolkitsforschools/subarea.cfm?sa=20
