Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI

În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.

 
       
         
    STUDIA PHILOSOPHIA - Ediţia nr.3 din 2020  
         
  Articol:   RETHINKING KNOWLEDGE-THAT AND KNOWLEDGE-HOW: PERFORMANCE, INFORMATION AND FEEDBACK.

Autori:  JUAN FELIPE MIRANDA MEDINA.
 
       
         
  Rezumat:  
DOI: 10.24193/subbphil.2020.3.04

Published Online: 2020-12-20
Published Print: 2020-12-30
pp. 73-98

VIEW PDF

FULL PDF

ABSTRACT: This work approaches the distinction between knowledge-how and knowledge-that in terms of two complementary concepts: performance and information. In order to do so, I formulate Ryle’s argument of infinite regress in terms of performance in order to show that Stanley and Williamson’s counterargument has no real object: both reject the view that the exercise of knowledge-that necessarily requires the previous consideration of propositions. Next, using the concept of feedback, I argue that Stanley and Williamson’s positive account of knowledge-how in terms of knowledge-that corresponds to the output of the comparison between an intention of action and the perceived outcome of performance. Then, I expound other theories of mind and cognition in which feedback and prediction play a fundamental role in order to explain other ways in which information intervenes in performance—i.e., information is construed as knowledge-that available at subject level that guides performance. Finally, I present some reflections on the impact of the concept of knowledge-how, and possible routes to continue our enquiry on the nature of knowledge.

Keywords: knowledge-how, knowledge-that, information, performance, feedback.
 
         
     
         
         
      Revenire la pagina precedentă