Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI

În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.

 
       
         
    STUDIA PHILOSOPHIA - Ediţia nr.3 din 2015  
         
  Articol:   SYLLOGISTIC REASONING FROM PETRUS HISPANUS TO MODERN CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.

Autori:  . 		 
       
         
  Rezumat:   This paper is going to present the syllogistic reasoning beginning with the Middle Ages and comparing the traditional type of this kind of reasoning with some modern conceptualizations (Hodges and Makinson). In this paper is emphasized the view of Petrus Hispanus, a Middle Age philosopher who based his point on Aristotle’s and Boethius’ logic. There is a difference between their presentations of this reasoning. The conceptual difference between Aristotle’s and the traditional one is going to be pointed. The problem of the fourth figure is also going to be considered. The conclusion of this analysis is going to underline the evolution and continuity of the syllogistic reasoning. 

Keywords: syllogism, fourth figure, proposition, Summulae Logicales, reasoning, traditional logic, modern logic
 
         
     
         
         
      Revenire la pagina precedentă