Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI

În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.

 
       
         
    STUDIA PHILOSOPHIA - Ediţia nr.2 din 2020  
         
  Articol:   PHENOMENOLOGY AND PSYCHOANALYTIC THEORY. HUSSERL’S CRITIQUE OF PSYCHOLOGISM AS COMMON GROUND.

Autori:  CRISTIAN BODEA. 		 
       
         
  Rezumat:  
DOI: 10.24193/subbphil.2020.2.07

Published Online: 2020-08-10
Published Print: 2020-08-10
pp. 115-126

VIEW PDF

FULL PDF

ABSTRACT.
This paper is addressing Husserl’s critique of psychologism in order to gain a better understanding of an up to date phenomenological research. Staring with Maurice Merleau-Ponty, phenomenology became more and more interested in how psychoanalytic theory can contribute to its findings. The latest phenomenological research reflects this growing interest in psychoanalysis. I will demonstrate in this paper that Husserl’s critique of psychologism enables this interest and that the psychoanalytic theory offers the same critique in response. Thus, the ego problem leading to the deadlock of intersubjectivity, represent one of the common grounds phenomenology and psychoanalysis can meet. In this respect I will use the works of Marc Richir and Jacques Lacan. Emphasizing Marc Richir’s conception of language as phenomenon and the twist he gives to the concept of perceptive phantasia introduced by Husserl in 1918, I will consider the concept of unconscious as a way to solve the intersubjectivity dilemma.

Keywords: ego, intersubjectivity, “perceptive” phantasia, psychologism, transcendental interfacticity, unconscious. 		 
         
     
         
         
      Revenire la pagina precedentă