Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI

În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.

 
       
         
    STUDIA EUROPAEA - Ediţia nr.1 din 2016  
         
  Articol:   THE BATTLE FOR THE “ROMANIAN AUTUMN” – GOOD GOVERNANCE VERSUS ANTI-CAPITALIST DISCOURSES IN THE ROMANIAN 2013 PROTESTS.

Autori:  . 		 
       
         
  Rezumat:  The article explores how different actors had tried to frame and to appropriate the meaning of the anti-mining protests that started in September 2013. The analysis focuses on two discourses that had disputed the construction of the protest’ knowledge: the “good governance” discourse versus the “anti-capitalistic” discourse. This confrontation is described as an attempt to establish a different “regime of truth” by the anti-capitalist narrative proponents. The assumption of the article is that the protests from 2013 had marked a return to “real politics”, by re-politicizing the Romanian realities and disrupting the post-communist consensus. However, it argues that keeping the claims in the good governance framework had minimized the re-politicization potential of the social movement emerging from the protest (#UnitiSalvam), by obscuring some of the latent conflict that undercrosss the Romanian society. The article also explores the factors that contributed to the anti-capitalist discourse’s failure to impose a different rhetoric of the protest, by looking into the “good governance” discourse trajectory in the post-communist Romania and observing how it established itself as a hegemonic discourse.

Keywords: Romanian Autumn, anti-mining protests, politics, hegemonic discourse, good-governance, anti-capitalism 		 
         
     
         
         
      Revenire la pagina precedentă