AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
|
|||||||
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului. |
|||||||
STUDIA EUROPAEA - Ediţia nr.1 din 2005 | |||||||
Articol: |
ADRIAN MARINO - SPIRIT EUROPEAN / ADRIAN MARINO - THE EUROPEAN SPIRIT. Autori: ANDREI MARGA. |
||||||
Rezumat: How do the Romanian intellectuals relate to the European approach? If we take into account the public expressions (press, books, etc.), then we can identify fairly quickly some well shaped prototype attitudes: the passeistic nationalism; the conservative nationalism; the utopian European; the opportunistic European; the pan European. The Romanian nation was formed late (without being singular from this point of view), and its formation came up against serious obstacles, which it had to overcome, starting, in a somewhat forced manner, from the outskirts of society. However, the edge of society created the mentality of isolation and solitary fight. The passeistic nationalism positions itself, in a completely unreflexive way, in this mentality that it reprises as some sort of supreme wisdom. It sees only enemies around it and calls for mobilization. Paradoxically, however, it reprises this mentality long after the fight has been won, and when there are other issues on the agenda: achieving performance in knowledge, democratisation, living conditions. Why does it do this? Because, - put in simple terms - it is nothing but a diversion. The nationalistic agitations from more than one century ago (which, in the context of those days, was not without reason!) is visibly the work of the old secret services, and afterwards, as usual, the action of the demagogues. Many intellectuals practice it from various reasons: secret obedience towards those services, lack of professional competitiveness, absence of communication skills in foreign languages. For them, the new Europe, with supranational structures, is evil itself. | |||||||