Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI

În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.

 
       
         
    STUDIA EDUCATIO%20ARTIS%20GYMNASTICAE - Ediţia nr.1 din 2022  
         
  Articol:   PATIENT SATISFACTION SURVEY IN HOSPITALS PROVIDING SPA CARE IN HUNGARY.

Autori:  VERONIKA VARGA, MÓNIKA SÉLLEYNÉ GYURÓ, REBEKA JUHÁSZ, VIKTOR KOCZKA, BÁLINT SZŐTS, BÁLINT MOLICS, IMRE BONCZ.
 
       
         
  Rezumat:  
DOI: 10.24193/subbeag.67(1).01

Article history: Received 2022 March 05; Revised 2022 March 25; Accepted 2022 March 28;
Available online 2022 May 5; Available print 2022 May 30.
©2022 Studia UBB Educatio Artis Gymnasticae. Published by Babeş-Bolyai University.
pp. 5-18

VIEW PDF

FULL PDF

Abstract: Introduction: Balneotherapy and hydrotherapy treatments with a proven therapeutic effect are of great help to patients in early recovery. Objective: The aim of our study is to assess patient satisfaction in two health care institutions in Hungary. Methods: We conducted a questionnaire survey among the patients of two spas and other hospitals (H1: n=69 H2: n=59) in Hungary in 2019. The obtained results were evaluated with SPSS 25.0 software. Results: 74.22% of the respondents were female (n=95) and 25.78% were male (n=33), of whom 46.78% (n=60) were between 61 and 70 years of age. 71.88% (n=92) of the respondents were informed about the discounted treatments by their specialist and the majority were patients who return annually (n=106), who come again mainly (43.75%) for previous good experiences. They thought they would discover an 88.5% improvement in both the quality of care and treatments. Results of H1 and H2 hospital staff: help (H1: 6.61, H2: 6.05, p=0.001), pain relief (H1: 6.08, H2: 4.95, p=0.015) problem solving (H1: 6.16, H2: 5.46 p=0.009), information provision (H1: 5.82, H2: 5.05, p=0.050) were significantly higher in H1 hospital than in H2 hospital. In the overall picture of the institution, H2 achieved a higher result in terms of health improvement, despite the former lower evaluations, but there was no significance (H1: 5.86, H2: 6.00, p=0.584). Conclusions: Learning the use of treatments and patient satisfaction, constructive suggestions can be made to improve the quality of patient care.

Key words: patient satisfaction, spa, spa service, quality patient care
 
         
     
         
         
      Revenire la pagina precedentă