Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI

În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.

 
       
         
    STUDIA DRAMATICA - Ediţia nr.2 din 2015  
         
  Articol:   SPECTATORS OR PARTICIPANTS? A MAJOR CREATIVE SHIFT IN PERFORMING ARTS OR A CHANGE OF STATUS? (REMARKS ON A PROCESS).

Autori:  MARIAN POPESCU.
 
       
         
  Rezumat:  
VIEW PDF: SPECTATORS OR PARTICIPANTS? A MAJOR CREATIVE SHIFT IN PERFORMING ARTS OR A CHANGE OF STATUS? (REMARKS ON A PROCESS)

This article is a reflection of my research on the Anatomic Theatre. I question the theatre performance in the digital culture that makes out of this specific artistic procedure - to place the viewer as a Witness or as a Participant - one of the accommodating narratives of the theatre. Theatre direction is thus a μεταφορά (“transport” in Gr.), a theoretical vehicle that would result in a practice where viewers’ position towards performance is disputed between being Spectator or Participant.

Key words: spectator, theatre, performance, perspective, identification, representation, consubstantiality, digital culture.

References:

Nāṭyaśāstra, translated from Sanskrite and edited by Amita Bhose, Constantin Făgețan, București: Editura Științifică, Bibliotheca Orientalis, 1997, Print
Blakesley, David. “Chapter Five: Defining Film Rhetoric: The Case of Hitchcock''''s Vertigo,” in Defining Visual Rhetorics, ed. Charles A. Hill and Marguerite Helmers (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004), 124, http://www.questia.com/ read/104638134/defining-visual-rhetorics (accessed august 2, 2015)
Burke, Kenneth. A Rhetoric of Motives, Berkely/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press, 1969 (orig. ed. 1950), Print
Cassirer, Ernest. Philosophie der Symbolischen Formen, I, Berlin: “Die Sprache”, 1923 (quoted in Damisch)
Damisch, Hubert. L’origine de la perspective, Paris: Flammarion, 1993
de Certeau. Michel. L’invention du quotidien. 1. Arts de faire, Paris: Gallimard/Folio, 1990, Print
Ley, Graham. “Aristotle''''s Poetics, Bharatamuni''''s Natyasastra, and Zeami''''s Treatises: Theory as Discourse.” Asian Theatre Journal 17, no. 2 (2000), © 2008 University of Hawaii Press. © 2000 Gale Group. http://www.questia.com/read/1G1-68872769/aristotle-s-poetics-bharatamuni-s- (accessed august 2, 2015)
Wade, Nicholas J. and Swanston Michael T. Visual Perception: An Introduction, 2nd ed. (London: Psychology Press, 2001), 243, http://www.questia.com/read/108802985/visual-perception-an-introduction.natyasastra-and (accessed august 1, 2015)

Published Online: 2015-10
 
         
     
         
         
      Revenire la pagina precedentă