AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI
În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.
Autori: MARIA ALUAȘ.
It is difficult to give a definition that in any way clarifies the identity of the bioethicist. However, it is possible to assert that the activity of the bioethicist has a philosophical nature. This is because the questions that a bioethicist asks about technosciences are philosophical in nature. These topics have to do with the meaning of the construction of human identity within the technological action. On the other hand, it is possible to point out two important characteristics. The first is that their work is expressed as critical conscience. What is this “critical conscience”? A critical conscience provides a clarification of a specific practical and theoretical content introduced by technosciences. This “conscience” also tries to understand the historical condition of contemporary man - regardless of its geographical location - and, from it, make value judgments. The second characteristic is relative to the method with which it works and which is expressed in an esprit de finesse. That is, in its ability to use language precisely and to make distinctions between notions.
