AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
|
|||||||
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEÅž-BOLYAI În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului. |
|||||||
STUDIA PHILOLOGIA - Ediţia nr.2 din 2000 | |||||||
Articol: |
AMBIGUITY, NUMBER AND/OR LUCK, HAZARD. Autori: ÅžTEFAN GENCÄ‚RÄ‚U. |
||||||
Rezumat: Ambiguity, Number and/or Luck, Hazard. In this article we return to an interpretation that has gone through several stages of elaboration because, from our point of view, the signification of the text is dependent on strategies that achieve ambiguity. A critical as well as a stylistic investigation can lead to a change of perspective. The critical investigation reveals a consesus as far as Lefter Popescu – from the short story Two Lottery Tickets – is concerned. On the other hand, the stylistic investigation proves that Lefter Popescu is not the victim of any error. Using concepts like text truth, authorial instance, narrative sequence, authorial sequence, we identify the stylistic parts of the text with a view to showing that the author presents in the first interventions as true the concordance between the numbers and the lottery tickets, which makes Lefter Popescu a true winner. Being interested by the mechanisms of autentification and those of ambiguisation, we stop in this study at he sequences where Lefter Popescu is a winner according to the truth of the authorial intervention so that we can discover a logic of the process of ambiguisation, which will be discussed in detail in a future study. | |||||||